1- Why are you backing the challenges towards humanity, when it is exposed by the powerful?
2- if a failed attempt of car bomb blast is reported from New York City or Heathrow Air Port, it is the leading news of one or two weaks for the mainstream media. If hundreds of people are killed in Gaza Strip or Bagdad it is just a colomn news of inner pages or not a news. My question is, ''is there any difference between the blood of human beings in New York City and those of Gaza Stript.
3- For Muslims Prophet Muhammed, peace and blessings of God may be upon him, is the most revered and beloved in the world. So they love and respect everything related to him. If anyone makes him funny by sketching caricatures it will certainly injure their sentiments. Then what is compulsory over governments, media and intellectuals, is to control and prevent such attempts to make a large group injured. But now the so-called intellectuals as well as the governments are favoring it on the name of 'freedom of expression'.
Ok..
Is a citizen of a country free to choose what he have to wear and to make a selection in his dress code? Isn't it a fundamental right of a citizen to live with his beliefs and religious practices? Then why these intellectuals, writers and politicians support the ban of wearing headscarf or Hijab on Muslim women, who believe that it is a part of their religious righteousness and think it gives them safety and protection?
Then please tell me what is the criteria of freedom and what is its limits? Why the harmful caricature is freedom and the harmless Hijab is not so?
